It follows a nice article published on August 18th on www.spacedaily.com -reproduced by the blog BrazilianSpace- about the RS-25 rocket engine. The article highlights how complex a rocket engine is in comparison to one jet or car engine. Indeed, it considers that the RS-25 engine makes modern race car or jet engines look like wind-up toys.
RS-25 ENGINES: MEETING THE NEED FOR SPEED
By Staff Writers
Houston TX (SPX) Aug 18, 2015
Rocket engines are among the most amazing machines ever invented. That's mainly because they have to do one of the most extreme jobs ever conceived - spaceflight - starting with escaping Earth's deep gravity well. Orbital velocity, just for starters, is over 17,000 mph, and that only gets you a couple hundred miles off the surface. Going farther requires going faster. Much faster.
The RS-25 makes a modern race car or jet engine look like a wind-up toy. It has to handle temperatures as low as minus 400 degrees where the propellants enter the engine and as high as 6,000 degrees as the exhaust exits the combustion chamber where the propellants are burned.
It has to move a lot of propellants to generate a lot of energy. At the rate the four SLS core stage engines consume propellants, they could drain a family swimming pool in 1 minute.
The most complex part of the engine is its four turbopumps which are responsible for accelerating fuel and oxidizer to those insanely high flow rates. The high pressure fuel turbopump main shaft rotates at 37,000 rpms compared to about 3,000 rpm for a car engine at 60 mph.
The bottom line is that the RS-25 produces 512,000 pounds of thrust. That's more than 12 million horsepower. That's enough to push 10 giant aircraft carriers around the ocean at nearly 25 mph.
If the performance requirement to turn massive amounts of fuel into massive amounts of fire wasn't enough, an engine can't take up a lot of mass or area in a rocket. A car engine generates about half a single horsepower to each pound of engine weight. The RS-25 high pressure fuel turbopump generates 100 horsepower for each pound of its weight.
But forget mere car engines. The RS-25 is about the same weight and size as two F-15 jet fighter engines, yet it produces 8 times more thrust. A single turbine blade the size of a quarter - and the exact number and configuration inside the pump is now considered sensitive - produces more equivalent horsepower than a Corvette ZR1 engine.
On the other hand, when you chug fluids that fast, a hiccup is a bad thing. In the case of a rocket engine, that hiccup is called cavitation. At the least, it robs the engine of power. At worst, it can cause catastrophic overheating and overspeeding. So rocket engineers spend a lot of time making sure fluids flow straight and smooth.
That's also why they test rocket engines on the ground under highly instrumented and controlled conditions. It's a lot less costly to fail on the ground than in flight with a full rocket carrying people on board and/or a one-of-a-kind multi-million- or multi-billion-dollar payload.
As rocket engines go, the RS-25 may be the most advanced, operating at higher temperatures, pressures, and speeds than most any other engine. The advantage comes down to being able to launch more useful payload into space with less devoted to the rocket structure and its propellants.
In addition to its power, another key consideration for SLS was the availability of 16 flight engines and two ground test engines from the shuttle program. It's much harder and more expensive to develop a new engine from scratch. Using a high-performance engine that already existed gave NASA a considerable boost in developing its next rocket for space exploration.
The remaining shuttle engine inventory will be enough for the first four SLS flights. As for the maturity part, the RS-25 design dates to the 1970s and the start of the Space Shuttle Program. But it's undergone five major upgrades since then to improve performance, reliability, and safety.
If only we could all upgrade 5 times as we age. Further, much of the knowledge and infrastructure needed to use the available engines and restart production already existed. Another hidden savings in time and money.
In its next evolution, the RS-25 design will be changed to make it a more affordable engine designed for just one flight and certify it to even higher thrust - which it is very capable of - to make SLS an even more impressive launch vehicle.